<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Age of Wisdom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/</link>
	<description>The Business of Stopping Climate Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:33:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhea</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=288#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Great article. I am going to read &quot;The Long Emergency&quot; and see &quot;The Age of Stupid&quot; as soon as Netflix gets it. Oh, wait a minute. Isn&#039;t Netflix gonna die, too, with the coming of peak oil? The corner video store rises again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I am going to read &#8220;The Long Emergency&#8221; and see &#8220;The Age of Stupid&#8221; as soon as Netflix gets it. Oh, wait a minute. Isn&#8217;t Netflix gonna die, too, with the coming of peak oil? The corner video store rises again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Levy</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=288#comment-79</guid>
		<description>thanks for your comment, 
I read estimates of up to 100 years at current consumption rates for coal - I was being conservative. Rates might decline with a price on carbon. The bigger point is that oil prices are increasingly decoupled from power prices, and peak oil, by itself, will not shock us into a new renewable age. As with oil, coal won&#039;t just run out one day - if coal prices don&#039;t plummet, there will be new investments in smaller, perhaps more expensive fields even if the life of the investment is only 20-30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your comment,<br />
I read estimates of up to 100 years at current consumption rates for coal &#8211; I was being conservative. Rates might decline with a price on carbon. The bigger point is that oil prices are increasingly decoupled from power prices, and peak oil, by itself, will not shock us into a new renewable age. As with oil, coal won&#8217;t just run out one day &#8211; if coal prices don&#8217;t plummet, there will be new investments in smaller, perhaps more expensive fields even if the life of the investment is only 20-30 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seer</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/09/the-age-of-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Seer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=288#comment-78</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is enough cheap coal for fifty years at least, and nuclear power is expensive but stable in price.&quot;

That&#039;s an incompletely worded statement.  You need to define the rate of usage.  I&#039;m assuming that you mean at the current rate of use, without any increase (growth in consumption levels).  Clearly, adding any additional growth to current extraction/consumption rates (such as would happen by increased EVs) would decrease this time horizon.  But suppose that 50 years was the lifespan, large-scale investment for an infrastructure whose expected lifespan is 50 years is pretty hard to imagine.

Please refer to Dr. Albert Bartlett&#039;s presentation &quot;Arithmetic, Population and Energy&quot; (www.guba.com/watch/3000053112/Arithmetic-Population-Energy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is enough cheap coal for fifty years at least, and nuclear power is expensive but stable in price.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an incompletely worded statement.  You need to define the rate of usage.  I&#8217;m assuming that you mean at the current rate of use, without any increase (growth in consumption levels).  Clearly, adding any additional growth to current extraction/consumption rates (such as would happen by increased EVs) would decrease this time horizon.  But suppose that 50 years was the lifespan, large-scale investment for an infrastructure whose expected lifespan is 50 years is pretty hard to imagine.</p>
<p>Please refer to Dr. Albert Bartlett&#8217;s presentation &#8220;Arithmetic, Population and Energy&#8221; (www.guba.com/watch/3000053112/Arithmetic-Population-Energy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
