<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unleashing Exxon’s Resources for Low-Carbon Fuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateinc.org/2009/12/unleashing-exxon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/12/unleashing-exxon/</link>
	<description>The Business of Stopping Climate Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:33:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Best and worst practices of global energy firms : Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/12/unleashing-exxon/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Best and worst practices of global energy firms : Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=384#comment-161</guid>
		<description>[...] David Levy blogs on the project      Events [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Levy blogs on the project      Events [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Levy</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/12/unleashing-exxon/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=384#comment-127</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, geothermal is not the only short-term prospect. I think I&#039;m suffering from post Brokenhagen blues. I was thinking reliable baseload power. Wind has its intermittency problems, maxes out around 20% of the grid, though that could change with advanced storage and transmission. I&#039;m more pessimistic about biomass - local co-firing of wood waste is cost effective but limited in scale, and biofuels are for transportation, have a long way to go technologically, compete with food, soak up the water resources, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, geothermal is not the only short-term prospect. I think I&#8217;m suffering from post Brokenhagen blues. I was thinking reliable baseload power. Wind has its intermittency problems, maxes out around 20% of the grid, though that could change with advanced storage and transmission. I&#8217;m more pessimistic about biomass &#8211; local co-firing of wood waste is cost effective but limited in scale, and biofuels are for transportation, have a long way to go technologically, compete with food, soak up the water resources, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Konrad</title>
		<link>http://climateinc.org/2009/12/unleashing-exxon/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateinc.org/?p=384#comment-126</guid>
		<description>&quot;geothermal power, the only other prospect for short-term renewable energy&quot; - what ever happened to biomass and wind?

Besides, the project you refer to is an enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) project, which is not a short-term hope... conventional geothermal is small scale, but already here, while EGS is a research project, but has the potential to scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;geothermal power, the only other prospect for short-term renewable energy&#8221; &#8211; what ever happened to biomass and wind?</p>
<p>Besides, the project you refer to is an enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) project, which is not a short-term hope&#8230; conventional geothermal is small scale, but already here, while EGS is a research project, but has the potential to scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
